Let It Be
Somewhat surprisingly, Ottawa will not appeal the Ontario Provincial Court ruling permitting same-sex marriages.
Says Chretien: “We’ll be proposing legislation that will protect the right of churches and religious organizations to sanctify marriage as they define it. At the same time, we will ensure that our legislation includes and legally recognize the union of same-sex marriage.”
Trailblazing or not, I’m impressed. Treating people with respect and equality isn’t that hard, is it? I love the idea that Stephen Harper is probably physically ill about the whole thing.
There’s one thing I know for sure — Paul Martin (by the way, have you read his hepcat blog?) never would have let those rulings slide unless he expected votes as a result — and maybe that’s the whole point.
The crafty old man may have a few tricks up his sleeve yet.

Entry Title
Publish Date
Category Tags
Related Entries
Comments
I wonder: with such a contentious issue, I would think that, perhaps, the government would have turned to a referendum. I wonder how that would have turned out?
I don’t know that it’s really all that contentious.
Why not have a referendum to validate marriage between men and women? The math would suggest they’re not very effective, so why pay fruitless benefits there?
True. I don’t believe there should be benefits just because you are married. In fact, I have yet to see ANY benefits (in terms of taxes I mean). I have no problem with same-sex marriages. Just that if the government is concerned about some sort of backlash, why NOT resort to a referendum?
I’m personally beginning to suffer from complete apathy on the subject. I wonder how effective referendums, inquiries and the like really are.
There’s always enormous political spin and skewing regardless of the results. It just seems like whatever ‘interest group’ can leverage the most turnout wins.